High Court strikes down Tasmania’s excessive anti-protest laws
The High Court of Australia has ruled that key provisions of Tasmania’s excessive anti-protest legislation are invalid because they violate the implied freedom of political communication in the Australian Constitution.
The Executive Director of the Human Rights Law Centre, Hugh de Kretser, said the decision was a big win for democracy in Australia.
Today’s High Court ruling is a big win for democratic freedoms in Australia. Thanks for supporting our work. https://t.co/7QRcvxKJQE pic.twitter.com/nA0OWF866n
— HumanRightsLawCentre (@rightsagenda) October 18, 2017
“Free expression and the right to peaceful protest are essential to our democracy and must be protected. The High Court’s landmark decision protects these fundamental values.”
“These laws sought to prevent and punish protest that affects business. They were too broad, too harsh and too vague. They were thoroughly undemocratic and put corporate interests ahead of democratic interests,” said Mr de Kretser.
The Human Rights Law Centrewas granted permission by the High Court to intervene in the case to support the challenge by Dr Bob Brown and Jessica Hoyt.
The case centred around the arrest of Dr Brown on a public road while he was trying to film a video about a controversial logging project in Tasmania’s native Lapoinya forest. A second plaintiff, Jessica Hoyt, was separately arrested in the Lapoinya forest in similar circumstances.
“Today is a great day for the forests, wildlife and all of nature in Tasmania and around Australia. And a great day for the fundamental right of Australians to peaceful protest,” said Dr Brown.
Mr de Kretser said the Tasmanian laws are part of a broader undemocratic trend, with state governments across the country in recent years seeking to pass excessive laws that stifle peaceful protest.
“Governments shouldn’t be able to sell off our democratic rights in order to protect business interests. The High Court’s decision strikes down key parts of this excessive legislation that led to the arrests that sparked this case. The Tasmanian Government should now scrap the legislation entirely,” said Mr de Kretser.
The Court in its 183 page judgment ruled in favour of Dr Brown and Ms Hoyt by a six to one majority.
A big thanks to our incredible pro bono team of DLA Piper, Bret Walker SC, Jonathon Redwood and Prue Bindon.
For interviews or further information please call:
Hugh de Krester, Executive Director, Human Rights Law Centre, 0403 965 340
Media Enquiries
Chandi Bates
Media and Communications Manager

Albanese Government must act on whistleblower reform as David McBride’s appeal dismissed
The Human Rights Law Centre, the Alliance for Journalists’ Freedom and the Whistleblower Justice Fund are calling on the Albanese Government to act on urgent, robust whistleblower protection reform, after war crimes whistleblower David McBride’s appeal was dismissed today.
Read more
Tax whistleblower Richard Boyle’s guilty plea an indictment on Australia’s broken whistleblowing laws
The Human Rights Law Centre and the Whistleblower Justice Fund have condemned the Albanese Government’s ongoing prosecution of Richard Boyle, as the tax office whistleblower pleaded guilty at a hearing in Adelaide today.
Read more
Crisafulli Government’s shameful adult sentencing laws will harm kids, families, and communities
The Human Rights Law Centre and Change the Record have slammed the Crisafulli Government for passing laws that will sentence even more children to adult-length terms of imprisonment. The laws will lock up children for even longer, and harm kids, families, and communities.
Read more