Filter
keyboard_arrow_upChildren’s Right to the Presumption of Innocence and to be Tried as Minors
R v DB [2008] SCC 25 (16 May 2008) The Supreme Court of Canada recently considered the validity of a rebuttable presumption that minors committing serious offences should be sentenced as adults. A majority of the Court concluded that the presumption offended against the right not to be deprived of liberty otherwise than in accordance with principles of fundamental justice under s 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
Read moreACT Supreme Court Considers Right to Family Life under ACT Human Rights Act
In the Matter of an Adoption of D [2008] ACTSC 44 (15 May 2008)A decision of the ACT Supreme Court has considered the scope of the right to family life and protection in the context of adoption proceedings.
Read moreProcedural Safeguards, Evictions and the Right to Privacy and the Home
McCann v United Kingdom [2008] ECHR 19009/04 (13 May 2008) The European Court of Human Rights has found that the United Kingdom violated art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights by failing to provide adequate procedural safeguards to protect the right to respect of a person’s home in the context of public housing.
Read moreRight not to be Tried or Punished More than Once
Swain v Department of Infrastructure (General) [2008] VCAT 848 (9 May 2008) The Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal has held that a government authority’s refusal to issue a commercial driver’s licence on the basis of the applicant’s history of insurance fraud did not engage the applicant’s right to freedom from double punishment under s 26 of the Victorian Charter. However, on the facts, the applicant was nevertheless found to be entitled to such a licence.
Read moreVCAT Considers Interpretative Provision in Involuntary Treatment Case
MH6 v Mental Health Review Board (General) [2008] VCAT 846 (7 May 2008) In a decision regarding the review of an involuntary treatment order under the Mental Health Act 1986 (Vic), VCAT considered the application of the obligation under s 32(1) of the Charter to interpret laws consistently with human rights.
Read moreChildren and the Right to Privacy
Murray v Big Pictures (UK) Ltd [2008] EWCA Civ 446 (07 May 2008) The England and Wales Court of Appeal has considered that scope of a child’s right to privacy in a case in which photographs of the child of a celebrity were taken and published without consent.
Read moreHuman Rights Compatible Interpretation and the Right to a Fair Hearing
Guss v Aldy Corporation Pty Ltd & Anor (Civil Claims) [2008] VCAT 912 (1 May 2008) In this recent decision of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal, s 32(1) of the Charter was used to reject the previous interpretation of certain sections of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal Act 1998 (Vic).
Read moreFair Hearing may Require an Oral Hearing
Abrahamian v Austria [2008] ECHR 35354/04 (10 April 2008) The European Court of Human Rights has held that the right to a fair hearing requires an oral hearing which may only be dispensed of in exceptional circumstances.
Read moreUK House of Lords Considers Scope and Application of the Right to Life
Gentle, R (on the application of) & Anor v The Prime Minister & Anor [2008] UKHL 20 (9 April 2008) In a judgment handed down on 9 April 2008, the UK House of Lords held that the right to life protections under art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights did not impose a duty on the UK Government to hold an independent inquiry into the legality and decision-making process behind the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
Read moreSupreme Court considers Role of Commission and Court in Promoting Human Rights under the Charter
Kortel v Mirik and Mirik [2008] VSC 103 (4 April 2008) In this case, the Supreme Court was asked to consider the proper construction of s 6(2)(b) of the Charter, which provides that the ‘Charter applies to courts and tribunals to the extent that they have functions under Part 2’. Part 2 of the Charter enshrines a body of civil and political rights largely derived from the ICCPR. The issue arose in the context of the obligations of the Court to ensure a fair hearing to unrepresented litigants. The Court also considered the scope of the power of the Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission to intervene in a proceeding pursuant to s 40(1) of the Charter.
Read moreACT Supreme Court Considers Right to a Fair Trial under ACT Human Rights Act
R v DA [2008] ACTSC 26 (31 Mar 2008) In an ex tempore judgment delivered by Higgins CJ, the ACT Supreme Court has stated that s 21 of the Human Rights Act 2004 (ACT) confers a positive right to a fair trial and thereby modifies the common law which merely provides for the right to be free from an unfair trial.
Read moreMental Illness, Legal Capacity and Human Rights
Shtukaturov v Russia [2008] ECHR 44009/05 (27 March 2008) In this case, the European Court of Human Rights considered human rights issues arising from involuntary admission and treatment on the ground of mental illness.
Read more