A blow for democracy as Malinauskas government passes anti-protest laws
The Malinauskas Government’s anti-protest laws have passed the South Australian Legislative Council after an all night sitting. The laws, which were rushed through the Lower House of Parliament without any public consultation, will undermine the ability of everyone in South Australia to exercise their right to peacefully protest.
The Summary Offences (Obstruction of Public Places) Bill 2023 (SA) could see people hit with fines of up to $50,000 and three-month jail terms for obstructing a public place. Only one amendment to the Bill, by the Hon Connie Bonaros MLC, was successful. The amendment removed the element of ‘recklessness’ in the Bill which would have disproportionately criminalised peaceful protests and could have seen people jailed, for instance, for handing out pamphlets about gambling harm in front of a shop in Rundle Mall, or workers gathering on a footpath to demand better pay and conditions.
South Australia is the latest jurisdiction to impose severe penalties on people for engaging in peaceful protest, joining New South Wales, Tasmania, Victoria and Queensland who have passed anti-protest laws in the last five years. South Australia’s anti-protest laws carry the harshest financial penalties in Australia.
The Bill is excessive and will have a chilling effect on the right to protest in South Australia. The Bill is also potentially unconstitutional and in clear breach of well-established principles of international human rights law.
David Mejia-Canales, Senior Lawyer at the Human Rights Law Centre said:
“Australia’s democracy is stronger when people protest on issues they care about. The Malinauskas Government’s new laws are not only anti-protest, but they are also anti-people. I thank the cross bench for their tireless work, all night, to amend the Bill.
“The right to protest is fundamental to our democracy. Protest has been crucial to achieving many important social changes from First Nations land rights to the eight-hour workday. Under these new laws, the people who stood up for our rights would be locked up behind bars.
“We consider it highly likely that this law will end up in the High Court given the significant chilling effect it risks having on advocacy and democratic participation across the state.”
Media contact:
Thomas Feng, Media and Communications Manager, 0431 285 275, thomas.feng@hrlc.org.au
Michelle Bennett, Engagement Director, 0419 100 519, michelle.bennett@hrlc.org.au
Media Enquiries
Chandi Bates
Media and Communications Manager
Rio Tinto to face scrutiny at AGM for response to Panguna mine disaster
As shareholders meet in Perth today for Rio Tinto’s AGM, communities living with the ongoing devastation from Rio Tinto’s former Panguna mine are calling for the company to urgently commit to funding long-term solutions.
Read more
Malinauskas Government must take historic opportunity and adopt Human Rights Act after inquiry recommendation
The Human Rights Law Centre has congratulated the South Australian parliamentary inquiry recommendation for a South Australian Human Rights Act.
Read more
Legal challenge filed against Tasmanian Parole Board’s decision to gag free speech
The Human Rights Law Centre has filed legal proceedings on behalf of Tasmanian grandmother, Susan Neill-Fraser, to challenge a restrictive parole condition placed on her by the Tasmanian Parole Board seeking to limit her ability to speak to the media.
Read more
Acknowledgement of Country
The Human Rights Law Centre acknowledges the Traditional Owners of the lands across Australia, including the lands of the Wurundjeri, Boon Wurrung, Gadigal, Ngunnawal, Darug and Wadawurrung people where we work from.
We pay our respect to Elders past and present. This land always was, and always will be Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander land. Sovereignty has never been ceded.
WARNING: This site contains images or names of people who have passed away.